Difference between revisions of "WGO Redesign"

From GIMP Developer Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(start)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Hold on...
+
== Why? ==
 +
 
 +
The email from Cristobal on the Gimp-web list recently prompted this further discussion.
 +
His summary of work and ideas were documented on [https://leivaburto.github.io/gimp-web-revamp/ this page].
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
=== Assumption ===
 +
* We (the royal 'We') could benefit from having more content on WGO, in particular tutorials.
 +
* Lowering the barrier-to-entry can help entice users to generate new content.
 +
* A new facelift can't hurt from a PR standpoint.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
=== Benefits ===
 +
There are a few possible benefits from conducting a redesign now:
 +
* Better organization of content
 +
:If the content organization is approached as described below.
 +
* Modern Look
 +
* A chance to consider usability and ease of access for users (and to improve it)
 +
* Lowering the barrier to entry for new contributors/contributions.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
== Summary ==

Revision as of 15:30, 2 April 2015

Why?

The email from Cristobal on the Gimp-web list recently prompted this further discussion. His summary of work and ideas were documented on this page.


Assumption

  • We (the royal 'We') could benefit from having more content on WGO, in particular tutorials.
  • Lowering the barrier-to-entry can help entice users to generate new content.
  • A new facelift can't hurt from a PR standpoint.


Benefits

There are a few possible benefits from conducting a redesign now:

  • Better organization of content
If the content organization is approached as described below.
  • Modern Look
  • A chance to consider usability and ease of access for users (and to improve it)
  • Lowering the barrier to entry for new contributors/contributions.


Summary